Pitching Reviews

Pitching Reviews

Mardan Law Reviews publishes a wide range of nonfiction content, with a primary focus on in-depth reviews of legal scholarship, court decisions, and essays that examine developments in law and legal theory. We value writing that presents a clear, original argument and demonstrates a rigorous, analytical approach. Proposals should be well-organized, articulate, and provide fresh insights into significant legal matters.

We accept reviews in various formats, from shorter book reviews (1,000–2,500 words) to longer, more comprehensive essays (2,500–5,000 words) for our commentary section. Writers are encouraged to explore any relevant legal topic, though we maintain a list of current books, cases, and legal issues we are particularly interested in covering. However, we welcome submissions on topics that may not yet be on our radar.

How to Pitch a Nonfiction Piece

As of Fall 2023, Mardan Law Reviews only accepts nonfiction submissions via email pitches.

To pitch a nonfiction piece, please email us at editors[at]mardanlaw[dot]org with the subject line “PITCH.” In the body of the email, provide a succinct summary (200–300 words) of your proposed piece, including an outline of your argument, objectives, and the legal significance of your piece. Be sure to explain why your piece would be a good fit for Mardan Law Reviews and how it contributes to ongoing legal discussions. Additionally, include a short bio that highlights your qualifications and expertise.

If we are interested in your pitch, we can typically request a review copy or access to any relevant materials to support your piece.

Submitting a Completed Draft

If you have already written a completed draft of a review, essay, or legal analysis, you can submit it directly following the same guidelines outlined above. Please send the draft as an attachment, along with a brief summary of the piece and your bio in the body of the email.

Note: Mardan Law Reviews does not publish memoirs, personal narratives, or purely opinion-based pieces. We prioritize scholarly analysis, critical reviews, and thought-provoking commentary on legal developments and scholarship.